Sometimes, even a poorly recorded and visually unappealing electrocardiogram (ECG) trace can illuminate our understanding, as in the case described below.

An 85-year-old woman presented to our emergency room (ER) following a syncope. Upon arrival, she was alert, asymptomatic, and in good clinical condition, without any significant traumatic injuries. Laboratory tests revealed no signs of acute cardiac disease; electrolyte levels were normal, and she was not taking any medications known to impair cardiac conduction (her only medication was ramipril for arterial hypertension). The ECG shown in Figure 1 was recorded in the ER, but unfortunately became darkened after being left on the doctor’s desk under a strong lamp for several hours, awaiting interpretation.

At first glance, the ECG appears to show a curious pattern suggestive of trifascicular block, with a rare form of distal Wenckebach periodicity, alternating conduction in the anterior and posterior fascicles of the left bundle branch (LBB), and an apparent 3:2 atrioventricular (AV) block. However, on closer inspection, the correct interpretation is more likely as follows:

1.

Sinus rhythm with 2:1 AV block and LBB block (LBBB) with left axis deviation in the conducted sinus beats. The symptoms and the presence of LBBB in the conducted beats suggest a distal nature of the second-degree AV block present, making a diffuse pathology of the distal conduction system very likely. Therefore, the site of the P block (since the LBB is already blocked in the basal state) can be the right bundle branch or (less likely) the His bundle.

What findings support this interpretation? The following observations, involving both depolarization and repolarization, are noteworthy:

1.

The morphology of the beats with right axis deviation is not consistent with left posterior fascicular block (LPFB), as it lacks the typical S1Q3 pattern, the rS pattern in aVL, and the qR complex in leads II, III, and aVF [1]. Furthermore, the pseudo-delta wave morphology at the onset of the QRS complexes in leads V4 and V5 suggests an intramyocardial or epicardial origin of the ventricular depolarization [2].

A second ECG, recorded shortly after the one already discussed (Figure 2) shows 2:1 and 3:2 Mobitz II AV block and confirms the ventricular nature of the ectopic beats, clearly showing no temporal relationship with atrial activity.

Given the symptoms and the likely distal origin of the second-degree AV block—along with the known increased susceptibility in women to ventricular arrhythmias during AV block [5]—the patient underwent in the same day of arrival, DDD pacemaker implantation. An electrophysiological study was deemed unnecessary. After more than a year of follow-up, the patient is in good clinical condition: she is asymptomatic (no further syncopal episodes have occurred) and in good hemodynamic equilibrium. Her ECG shows (on prolonged observation) regular sinus rhythm and ventricular activity stimulated by the pacemaker operating in VDD mode. The timeline of the case is shown in Figure 3.

Thus, even an aesthetically poor-quality ECG can yield insights that extend far beyond the surface appearance of the trace. Furthermore, this case seems to tell us that an accurate analysis of a simple and inexpensive ECG can offer us a large amount of physiopathological, clinical, and prognostic information, making other expensive and invasive investigations unnecessary.